Evaluation
REA Analytics provides comprehensive evaluation services to help organizations measure performance, demonstrate outcomes, meet federal requirements, and use data to continuously improve their programs.
Our evaluation team can support your organization from evaluation planning and data collection through analysis, reporting, and continuous quality improvement.
Our Evaluation Services Include
-
External Program Evaluation
-
Evaluation Planning & Design
-
Performance Measurement
-
Data Collection, Management & Analysis
-
Outcome & Impact Measurement
-
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
-
Federal Reporting & Evaluation Deliverables
-
SPARS Data Entry & Reporting
-
GPRA Data Collection & Reporting
-
SUPRT Data Support
-
Technical Assistance
-
Evaluation Reports & Performance Documentation
Whether you need an external evaluator for a federal grant, support with required performance reporting, or help turning your data into actionable improvements, REA can provide the evaluation expertise and ongoing support you need.
From collecting the right data to demonstrating meaningful results, we help you prove your impact and move your mission forward.
REA outlines clear outcome measures for the population or program of focus. Our expertise in quantitative data analysis, data visualization, and statistical modeling outlines the impact of your work on these outcomes.
Process Evaluation
REA conducts Implementation Workgroup meetings, offering an opportunity to detail and document progress towards program goals, program successes, and program challenges to provide a detailed view of the implementation process. Use of qualitative data analysis helps to integrate population of focus or staff feedback to provide unique perspectives on the data.
Continuous Quality Improvement
REA provides continuous data visualizations of program elements and outcomes. These are routinely reviewed with program managers to identify ineffective program elements, underperforming populations, and devise strategic plans for addressing these issues with program partners.
The integration of these three elements ensures the program is continually improving, and that all outcomes are provided in context of the implementation that occurred.
This allows results to be traced to specific implementation steps, that, regardless of the outcome, there is a clear explanation behind them.